Photo via thehindu.com
Unauthorized Nationwide Protests Demand Gyanesh Kumar's Resignation Over Electoral Roll Revision
Youth groups and opposition parties are mobilizing mass demonstrations against the Chief Election Commissioner, citing allegations that a major voter roll revision process has disenfranchised millions—and that Kumar's own colleagues on the Election Commission have formally objected to his decisions.
What happened
Protests demanding the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar have spread across India since late September 2026, centered on allegations that a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process is removing millions of eligible voters from electoral rolls. The Cockroach Janata Party issued an initial ultimatum on September 24, followed by Congress-led mobilizations and demonstrations in multiple states. Youth groups have pledged to continue protests until Kumar steps down, with more than 400 detained during a recent Mumbai demonstration.
The controversy intensified after The Indian Express reported that Kumar's fellow election commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi, have formally objected on record at least 14 times over the past 10 months to decisions they said were made without their knowledge or consent. Objections included changes to voter registration forms and centralized control of the electoral database. The Election Commission has stated such disagreements are normal and that final decisions were unanimous, but neither commissioner has publicly addressed the reported objections.
Opposition parties and regional leaders have accused the SIR process of disproportionately targeting opposition-leaning constituencies and benefiting Prime Minister Narendra Modi's BJP. Telangana's BRS working president K.T. Rama Rao demanded Kumar's removal, arguing no citizen can be stripped of voting rights. Congress leaders including Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi have similarly called for the CEC's resignation. The Election Commission and BJP have denied any wrongdoing.
Kumar's appointment itself was contested. He became the first CEC appointed under a 2023 law that replaced the Chief Justice of India on the selection panel with a Union Cabinet minister, giving the government a majority on the three-member panel. The Supreme Court upheld the SIR's legality in May 2026, but tensions over electoral roll deletions—which reached 15% in the most recent phase—have driven intensifying public pressure for accountability.
Chanakya's Move
This is an opposition play to reclaim narrative control over electoral credibility after losing parliamentary impeachment routes and Supreme Court litigation. The opposition's bet is that sustained street pressure—not institutional procedure—will force Kumar's removal or resignation. The underlying strategic calculation: if they can keep the SIR controversy and commission dissent in public view, they shift the cost of defending Kumar to Modi's government, and every voter removed becomes a constituency of grievance that affects future elections. Kumar's counter-move has been institutional resilience: claiming unanimity on decisions, denying the objections have substantive weight, and relying on the Supreme Court's May 2026 validation of the SIR process itself. What could counter this? A credible finding by either the Supreme Court (in existing or new petitions) that the SIR rollouts were unconstitutional or improperly executed; or a state-level reversal of the process in BJP-ruled states, which would signal internal party doubts about the cost of defending Kumar.