Photo via indiatoday.in
India votes with 130 nations to end US embargo on Cuba
India reaffirmed opposition to extraterritorial laws, but support for lifting the embargo hit a 30-year low as Trump administration pressure increased.
What happened
India voted in favor of a UN General Assembly resolution calling for an end to the US embargo on Cuba on October 28-29, 2026, emphasizing its opposition to laws with extraterritorial effects. The resolution passed with 130 votes in favor, 17 opposed, and 25 abstentions—the lowest support since 1995. Speaking at the Assembly, counsellor Soumya Nair of India's UN Mission stated that New Delhi endorses the call for all nations to reject 'laws and regulations with extraterritorial effects that adversely affect the sovereignty of other states.'
The vote reflected intensified Trump administration pressure to isolate Cuba. Compared to 2025, support dropped sharply: 165 countries voted in favor last year, and just 35 countries switched positions or abstained this year. Cuban officials accused the US of threatening countries with tariffs and visa restrictions to change their votes.
A dramatic confrontation between Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez and US Ambassador Mike Waltz on the Assembly floor preceded the vote, resulting in a Cuban diplomat's expulsion. The annual embargo resolution has been approved by the General Assembly 34 times since 1992, except in 2020, but carries no binding legal force.
Chanakya's Move
India used this vote to operationalize a core strategic principle: opposition to unilateral coercion disguised as law. By voting despite Trump administration pressure—even as the US successfully peeled away support from major economies like South Korea and Germany—India is signaling that it retains strategic autonomy on sovereignty issues, particularly those affecting developing nations. The move protects India's own strategic space: if New Delhi can be pressured into accepting US secondary sanctions on Cuba today, it becomes vulnerable to similar pressure on Iran, Russia, or other states India has independent reasons to engage with. India's gambit bets that a consistent, principled stance on non-interference will strengthen its position as a voice for the Global South and reduce future pressure. The Trump administration's counter-move (lobbying to increase abstentions and peeling off allies) suggests Washington sees votes like this not merely as symbolic but as indicators of whose coalition is growing.