Photo via scmp.com
Trump says he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize but doubts he'll get it
The President makes a closing case for the award ahead of Friday's announcement, citing eight conflicts he claims to have resolved while acknowledging the committee's track record.
What happened
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he should win the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize but expressed skepticism about his chances, saying the Norwegian Nobel Committee "has a reputation for maybe not giving it to people like me." Trump is among 287 nominees for the prize, which will be announced Friday. In remarks to reporters at the White House, Trump claimed to have settled eight wars and said it would be "a great discredit" to the committee if he is not selected.
He cited his role in conflicts including Rwanda-Congo, India-Pakistan, Armenia-Azerbaijan, Israel-Hamas, Israel-Iran, Cambodia-Thailand, Egypt-Ethiopia, and Serbia-Kosovo. Trump also referenced receiving last year's Nobel Peace Prize medal indirectly when Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado, the 2025 laureate, gave it to him in January following U.S. intervention in Venezuela. However, experts and parties to several conflicts dispute Trump's characterizations.
Fighting between Rwanda-backed M23 rebels and Congolese forces has continued despite Trump's June 2025 peace agreement. India has denied U.S. mediation played a role in its ceasefire with Pakistan, while some conflicts Trump lists—such as Egypt-Ethiopia—were diplomatic disputes rather than wars. Ukraine's conflict remains unresolved, contrary to Trump's earlier pledge to end it quickly. The Norwegian Nobel Committee will announce the 2026 recipient on Friday at 11 a.m. CEST.
Chanakya's Move
Trump's move is a last-minute play for international legitimacy before the Nobel Committee announces its choice. By making bold claims about settling eight wars while simultaneously expressing public doubt about winning, he achieves multiple ends: he raises the stakes for the announcement, primes supporters to view rejection as evidence of anti-Trump bias, and positions himself as a peacemaker regardless of the outcome. The strategy reflects a deeper bet that repeating peace narratives—even when disputed by other countries and experts—shapes perception among his base and international allies. If the committee rejects him, Trump has already framed it as bias. If it does select him, the loudly stated claims mean he dominates the framing of the award. Either way, he controls the narrative around the announcement.